tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7079931756934339155.post347623873672004983..comments2023-09-05T09:34:54.920-05:00Comments on BibleX: Charles Haddon Spurgeon and Textual CriticismCharles Savellehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11481608525537223764noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7079931756934339155.post-19588509402512935872014-10-11T09:17:06.443-05:002014-10-11T09:17:06.443-05:00Thanks for sharing this, James.Thanks for sharing this, James.Charles Savellehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11481608525537223764noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7079931756934339155.post-56194860347412625772014-10-10T23:21:26.253-05:002014-10-10T23:21:26.253-05:00He seems to have adamantly endorsed the canonicity...He seems to have adamantly endorsed the canonicity of Mark 16:9-20 -- <br />From <br />http://www.spurgeon.org/sermons/0573.htm<br />-- <br /><br />"The lines containing the commission of our ascended Lord are certainly of the utmost importance, and demand devout attention and implicit obedience, not only from all who aspire to the work of the ministry, but also from all who hear the message of mercy. A clear understanding of these words is absolutely necessary to our success in our Master's work, for if we do not understand the commission it is not at all likely that we shall discharge it aright. To alter these words were more than impertinence, it would involve the crime of treason against the authority of Christ and the best interests of the souls of men." James Snapp Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.com