Last week I drew attention to Andrew Perriman's post on the nature of David's sin with Bathsheba, notably whether it should be classified as adultery or rape (see here). Perriman has now followed up with another post here where he addresses some challenges to his original post. I think Perriman has the better of it. One can see a somewhat different perspective in Carmen Imes' essay here, although I think these two are talking a bit past one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment