BibleExposition.net exists to share ideas related to the exposition of God's Word and explore topics related to the Bible in general, theology (both biblical and systematic), archaeology, ministry, and life.
Paul Wallace at the Reformed Baptist blog is giving up blogging. While people start and end blogs all the time, Paul's rationale for quitting is worth hearing. Read it here.
Hall Harris has a good post on the challenges of translating singular nouns and plural verbs. This is an excellent example of the difficulties of translating and one reason I am so appreciative of those who do it well and allow me to benefit through their work.
The Cal.vini.st blog has posted an extensive list of resources related to the cessassionist position concerning spiritual gifts. You can access the listing here.
Keith Mathison Ligonier Ministries has a list and discussion of his top five commentaries on Daniel at the Ligonier Ministries blog. In evaluating this list I am somewhat hindered by the fact that I have not interacted with the commentaries by Lucas or Duguid. But, I would suggest that the top five should include S. Miller's commentary in the New American Commentary series and Goldingay in the Word series. Some more conservative interpreters might have problems with Goldingay, especially on introductory matters, but his interaction with the text itself is quite good. As far as the best overall, general commentary I would give the nod to Miller. That being said, I would probably bump Young and Ferguson out of the top five and into the Runners Up category. In the Runners Up category I would add Archer (EBC), L. Wood, D. Pentecost (BKC). In any case, the Mathison’s top five are:
1. E.J. Young -- Daniel (1949).
2. Iain M. Duguid -- Daniel (Reformed Expository Commentary, 2008).
3. Sinclair Ferguson -- Daniel (The Preacher's Commentary, 2002).
4. Tremper Longman III -- Daniel (NIV Application Commentary, 1999).
5. Ernest Lucas -- Daniel (Apollos Old Testament Commentary, 2002).
John Walton has posted on the topic of the tabernacle and how it compares to other ancient Near Eastern temples. While such comparisons are interesting and perhaps valid, it is important to keep in mind that the tabernacle was designed by God (which Walton acknowledges) and that it was not patterned after earthly structures but a heavenly one (Heb 9).