You see all kinds of stuff on Facebook. Apparently you can actually buy this.
Feb 22, 2025
Sep 28, 2022
The Date of the Davidic Covenant
Todd Bolen has written a very good article arguing that the Davidic Covenant (2 Sam 7) was made with David earlier rather than later in his reign. I read an earlier version of this article and have been persuaded that Todd is right. But you can access it here through links provided at his blog.
Jul 19, 2022
The Nature of David Sin Against Bathsheba, Again
Last week I drew attention to Andrew Perriman's post on the nature of David's sin with Bathsheba, notably whether it should be classified as adultery or rape (see here). Perriman has now followed up with another post here where he addresses some challenges to his original post. I think Perriman has the better of it. One can see a somewhat different perspective in Carmen Imes' essay here, although I think these two are talking a bit past one another.
Jul 14, 2022
The Nature of David Sin Against Bathsheba
Andrew Perriman has a very good post here addressing recent discussions related to the David's sin against Bathsheba, most specifically whether it amounted to rape.
Aug 27, 2021
A Biblical Theology of David and Goliath
Jason Hood has a very interesting treatment treatment here of the David and Goliath story (1 Sam 17). His biblical theology treatment is interesting and even persuasive. But, I am wrestling with how his approach is different from the allegorical approaches that he rejects at the beginning of the article. I see two differences. First, Hood replaces anthropocentric allegorical approaches with what he sees as a theocentric biblical theology approach. Second, he approaches the David and Goliath within the broader story of the Bible whereas some other popular allegorical approaches fall outside of the biblical story line. But some of Hood's connections, his tracing of the biblical theology, seem a bit of a stretch for me. In any case, the article is worth checking out.
Sep 28, 2020
David's Unfortunate Census
David's unfortunate census is recorded in 2 Samuel 24:1-17 and 1 Chronicles 21:1-30. There are a number of interpretive challenges related to this event, but perhaps one of the stickiest is whether David's numbering was prompted by God (2 Sam 24:1) or Satan (1 Chr 21:1). Sinclair Ferguson attempts to address this conundrum here. While I tend to agree with the principles behind his proposed theological solution, I do wish he would have spent more time in the actual texts of 2 Samuel and 1 Chronicles and looking first at the possible textual reasons behind the different approaches taken by the authors of the respective books.
Sep 19, 2020
Three Lessons from David’s Fall and Forgiveness
Jim Newheiser has a good discussion here highlighting three lessons drawn from the fallout from David's sin with Bathsheba (2 Sam 11). As I often say, David messed up royally (pun intended) but the Lord does not allow sin to have the last word.
Aug 2, 2020
"Son"
Oct 12, 2019
What Happened between David and Bathsheba
Unsigned article but discusses Rachael Denhollender's view
Denny Burk
Anne Kennedy
Ruth Graham
Jul 26, 2019
Was Bathsheba Bathing or Washing
Apr 1, 2019
Free Logos Book for April: A Theology of Matthew
Oct 23, 2018
Searching for the Historical King David Video, Again
Oct 10, 2018
Yosef Garfinkel: Searching for the Historical King David Video
Jun 22, 2018
David and Goliath
Jun 9, 2017
Archaeological Evidence for King David
Feb 23, 2016
Did David Author 4,050 Psalms!
leaving no trace of them.
Jan 8, 2015
How Did David Defeat Goliath?
HT: Lindsay Kennedy
Apr 28, 2013
McKenzie on the Messianic Kingdom
I have been scanning some old articles from my files and came across one from the Roman Catholic scholar John L. McKenzie. I have provided two excerpts, one from the beginning of the article and one from the end.
“Exegetes are not entirely in agreement on the extent on which messianism should be called eschatological: that is, whether the messianic hope is to be realized within history or outside history. In either case, however, messianism is understood to be a divine intervention in history and the establishment of the kingdom of God over all men. In the conclusion of this paper I shall state the meaning which I think should be attached to the word eschatological. Here at the beginning we must notice that the future kingdom of God is conceived and described in the terms of historical kingdom of Israel as the primary term of analogy; consequently, the messianic hope rarely appears entirely deprived of national features.”
“In conclusion, then, we can state that royal messianism is a conviction that Yahweh has promised the dynasty of David an eternal duration. With this eternal duration Israel is inescapably connected. The Davidic king and the kingdom of Israel are to extend their sway over the entire world and to be the medium through which the kingdom of Yahweh realize itself for all men, a kingship not of conquest and oppression like the world empire of the Assyrians, but a kingdom of justice, righteousness, peace and security. This hope in its earliest form focuses upon the dynasty as a whole, represented in each successive historical king. As time goes on and the historical perseverance of the dynasty becomes uncertain, and it finally comes to an end, the hope turns to an assurance that the promises of Yahweh will find fulfillment only in the restoration of the dynasty. Attention is then focused not upon the dynasty as a whole—for it no longer exists, or is shortly to perish—but rather upon the ruler who will restore the dynasty. This founder of the new dynasty will be another David in the sense that the reign is inaugurated with him. Like David, he will exhibit the qualities of the ideal king. In him the fullness of the spirit will be realized, upon him will rest the gifts of the spirit, and through him the power of Yahweh will establish His reign over the entire world, which will submit in peace to the rule of a righteous God.”
John L. McKenzie, “Royal Messianism, Catholic Bible Quarterly 19 (1957): 25, 51–52.

