Here are the articles to the forthcoming issue of the Journal for the Study of the New Testament. The links will take you to an abstract.
The Neighborhood (vicus) of the Corinthian ekklēsia: Beyond Family-Based Descriptions of the First Urban Christ-Believers – Richard Last
The Narratives of the Gospels and the Historical Jesus: Current Debates, Prior Debates and the Goal of Historical Jesus Research – Chris Keith
Hearing the Word and Seeing the Light: Voice and Vision in Acts – Brittany E. Wilson
The Seams and Summaries of Luke and of Acts – David L. Mealand
Demonic Symposia in the Apocalypse of John – Robert M. Royalty, Jr
Apr 29, 2016
Apr 28, 2016
Joshua 10 and NASA
I personally believe that something miraculous happened in Joshua 10:12-14. But I think it is past time that we stop referring to the old urban legend about NASA calculating and finding the missing day. You can read more about it here.
Apr 27, 2016
Seven Pieces of Advice for an Academic Job Interview
Although I have only been an interviewee rather than an interviewer, Michael Kruger seems to have some really sound advice here on how to handle an academic interview at a confessional institution .
Apr 26, 2016
John Piper on Cremation
John Piper has a good word and modest proposal on the cremation versus burial debate here.
Apr 25, 2016
Review of 40 Questions about the Historical Jesus
C. Marvin Pate, 40 Questions about the Historical Jesus (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2015).
That Jesus of Nazareth continues to be a person of much interest after nearly 2000 years is encouraging. But examining his incomparable person and life can present significant challenges for the serious student. On the one hand, there are apologetic approaches that tend to smooth over, flatten, or ignore tensions in the data when approaching the life of Jesus historically. On the other hand, others investigate the subject with an extreme skepticism and tend to present their conclusions in an unnecessarily provocative way. In some ways, Pate’s volume tries to steer a via media between these approaches.
As the title of the book implies, this 408 page work is centered on asking and answering forty questions related to the study of the historical Jesus. The forty questions are divided fairly equally into four parts. In part one, Pate interacts with eleven background-related questions. Part two addresses eight questions about Jesus’ birth and childhood. For part three, thirteen questions examine Jesus’ life and teaching. Finally, part four covers Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection.
Overall, this is a decent introductory resource that is conservative in its approach and honors the veracity of the biblical material. Some might argue that Pate’s conclusions are too conservative (perhaps bordering on apologetic) and that many of the tools or criteria that have been developed to explore the issue of the historical Jesus when properly used should reveal a bit more chaff among the wheat than he sees. This issue is one that I wish the author would have addressed. Namely, can or how can one use the tools of critical scholarship designed to identify authentic material from inauthentic material if one holds a high view of Scripture that does not allow for inauthentic material. I think devoting one of the forty questions to this issue could have been immensely helpful. This leads to another point that merits clarification. This book is not predominantly about the quests for the historical Jesus and the criteria used to pursue them. This is really more of a life of Christ or study of the Gospels. These are worthy areas of study, but I wonder whether the “historical” part might be (mis)understood in two different ways. That being said, I agree with Pate’s overall affirmation of the historical veracity of the biblical material.
This work is easy to read and packed with information. There are a number of helpful tables and the reflection questions at the end of the chapter could prove useful for those who want to use this work in a small group study or classroom environment. One might wish for more discussion here or there. For example, in the section on archaeology, Pate does not mention significant evidence related to personages connected to Jesus in the Gospels. Absent is any reference to the coinage of Herod the Great and Pilate and inscriptions such as the Pontius Pilate inscription discovered at Caesarea Maritima or the ossuary of Caiaphas. But overall I think there was a nice balance in the coverage of the topics related to the questions that were raised.
I would recommend this book as more of a primer to the life of Jesus and Gospel studies more generally. You will get a good presentation and defense of the “historical” Jesus. But, if one is looking for a good introduction to the critical quests for the “historical” Jesus and the criteria and principles that have guided it, then this volume is probably going to leave the reader wanting more.
You can read an excerpt here.
Thanks to the kind folks at Kregel for providing the copy used in this review.
That Jesus of Nazareth continues to be a person of much interest after nearly 2000 years is encouraging. But examining his incomparable person and life can present significant challenges for the serious student. On the one hand, there are apologetic approaches that tend to smooth over, flatten, or ignore tensions in the data when approaching the life of Jesus historically. On the other hand, others investigate the subject with an extreme skepticism and tend to present their conclusions in an unnecessarily provocative way. In some ways, Pate’s volume tries to steer a via media between these approaches.
As the title of the book implies, this 408 page work is centered on asking and answering forty questions related to the study of the historical Jesus. The forty questions are divided fairly equally into four parts. In part one, Pate interacts with eleven background-related questions. Part two addresses eight questions about Jesus’ birth and childhood. For part three, thirteen questions examine Jesus’ life and teaching. Finally, part four covers Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection.
Overall, this is a decent introductory resource that is conservative in its approach and honors the veracity of the biblical material. Some might argue that Pate’s conclusions are too conservative (perhaps bordering on apologetic) and that many of the tools or criteria that have been developed to explore the issue of the historical Jesus when properly used should reveal a bit more chaff among the wheat than he sees. This issue is one that I wish the author would have addressed. Namely, can or how can one use the tools of critical scholarship designed to identify authentic material from inauthentic material if one holds a high view of Scripture that does not allow for inauthentic material. I think devoting one of the forty questions to this issue could have been immensely helpful. This leads to another point that merits clarification. This book is not predominantly about the quests for the historical Jesus and the criteria used to pursue them. This is really more of a life of Christ or study of the Gospels. These are worthy areas of study, but I wonder whether the “historical” part might be (mis)understood in two different ways. That being said, I agree with Pate’s overall affirmation of the historical veracity of the biblical material.
This work is easy to read and packed with information. There are a number of helpful tables and the reflection questions at the end of the chapter could prove useful for those who want to use this work in a small group study or classroom environment. One might wish for more discussion here or there. For example, in the section on archaeology, Pate does not mention significant evidence related to personages connected to Jesus in the Gospels. Absent is any reference to the coinage of Herod the Great and Pilate and inscriptions such as the Pontius Pilate inscription discovered at Caesarea Maritima or the ossuary of Caiaphas. But overall I think there was a nice balance in the coverage of the topics related to the questions that were raised.
I would recommend this book as more of a primer to the life of Jesus and Gospel studies more generally. You will get a good presentation and defense of the “historical” Jesus. But, if one is looking for a good introduction to the critical quests for the “historical” Jesus and the criteria and principles that have guided it, then this volume is probably going to leave the reader wanting more.
You can read an excerpt here.
Thanks to the kind folks at Kregel for providing the copy used in this review.
Apr 24, 2016
The Theology of the Book of Lamentations
Erik Raymond has a good post on the challenging theology of Lamentations here.
Labels:
Biblical Theology,
Lamentations,
Old Testament
Apr 23, 2016
Some Online Resources for the Book of Daniel
Rob Bradshaw has a list of some online resources available for the book of Daniel here.
Apr 22, 2016
A Guide to Biblical Commentaries and Reference Works

Apr 21, 2016
The Pastor’s Week
Paul Lamey has some good thoughts on "The Pastor’s ‘Typical’ Week" here. I particularly enjoyed this point, "My Week Reflects My Theology."
Apr 20, 2016
Podcasts on Preaching and Preachers
Dr. Jason K. Allen, the president of Midwestern Seminary, is producing a series of free podcasts on preaching and preachers.You can check it out here.
HT: Rodrick Sweet
HT: Rodrick Sweet
Apr 19, 2016
Apr 18, 2016
Making the Most of Your Last Class Session
For you teachers and professors out there, this is a good article on getting the most from your last class session.
HT: George Hillman
HT: George Hillman
Apr 17, 2016
Michael Gorman on "Reading John Missionally"
You can access free audio of Michael Gorman's lecture "Reading John Missionally" here.
Apr 16, 2016
The Bible, Taxes, and Urine?
The Bible contains a number of "tax" related passages including Matthew 22:16-22 in which Jesus referred to a denarius and famously said, "render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." One can be thankful that our Lord used a coin and not some other things that have been taxed throughout history, including urine. See this article in National Geographic.
Labels:
Backgrounds,
Illustrations,
Matthew,
Money,
New Testament
Apr 15, 2016
Responding to Less than Spectacular Sermons or Lessons
Many of us have been there. Chuck Lawless has some good advice here on how to respond to less than spectacular sermons or lessons.
HT: Trevin Wax
HT: Trevin Wax
Apr 14, 2016
Apocalypse: The Perfume?
Someone has tried to replicate the smells of the book of Revelation. According to this article, the creators worked with "perfumer Euan McCall to translate the burnt flesh, blood,
and sea creatures of biblical end times into chemistry and producing a
surprisingly not unpleasant scent." Surely there is a sermon illustration here.
Labels:
Humor,
Illustrations,
Judgment,
New Testament,
Revelation
Apr 13, 2016
Spirit-Intended Applications?
Walt Russell has a very good discussion on what I would call a hermeneutics of application here.
Apr 12, 2016
Literacy Study and the Composition of the Hebrew Bible
A number of news outlets (e.g., ABC News, New York Times, Haaretz) are reporting on a study published this Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The study was based on a trove of about 100 letters inscribed in ink on pieces of pottery, known as ostracons, that were unearthed near the Dead Sea in an excavation of the Arad fort decades ago and dated from about 600 B.C. That was shortly before Nebuchadnezzar’s destruction of Jerusalem and the kingdom of Judah, and the exile of its elite to Babylon — and before many scholars believe the major part of the biblical texts, including the five books of Moses, also known as the Pentateuch, were written down in any cohesive form.While these ostracon do provide data supporting a more widespread literacy than some have held, they really do not have much to say about when the Hebrew Bible was written. So the headlines about providing evidence for when the Bible was written is misleading at best. I am glad that some are now suggesting an earlier date of composition that is often posited but the implied dating in the study is not nearly early enough.
Apr 11, 2016
Philo as Biblical Commentator: Leviticus

If anyone knows anything more about this volume, I would be very interested in hearing them.
Labels:
Backgrounds,
Leviticus,
Old Testament,
Philo,
Second Temple
Apr 8, 2016
Interesting Book?
Chanan Tigay's book, The Lost Book of Moses: The Hunt for the World's Oldest Bible sounds interesting. I am not sure my book list can stand another offering but you may have more time than me. You can read about it here.
Labels:
Bible,
Book,
Deuteronomy,
Old Testament,
Textual Criticism
Apr 7, 2016
Early New Testament Textual Recensions?
Larry Hurtado asserts that, "The continued claim that there was a datable “recension” of NT writings sometimes resembles the stubborn rear-guard action of a retreating force that’s been beaten in battle but won’t surrender." Read his explanation here.
Apr 6, 2016
Translating Porneia
Dr. David Hutchison, Associate Professor of New Testament at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary’s Houston campus recently gave a presentation related to a paper that he had presented at the 2015 Evangelical Theological Society meeting entitled, “Translating Porneia: Implications for Divorce, Pornography, and Homosexuality.”
The presentation surveyed the uses of porneia in the New Testament, Septuagint, Apocrypha, Deas Sea Scrolls, and Pseudepigrapha. These references suggest that porneia and its cognates should be understood as referring to all unlawful sexual intercourse or immoral sex but not more broadly to all forms of sexual immorality (e.g., lust). Or in other words, porneia is a smaller subset of sexual immorality.
A number of English translations were also examined. Hutchison noted that, “English translations from Tyndale to the 1901 ASV regularly translated porneia “fornication. In the 20th century, translations began to render the term more diversely, frequently using the broader concept of “sexual immorality.”
It was a helpful presentation and I hope that it will be published in some format in the near future.
The presentation surveyed the uses of porneia in the New Testament, Septuagint, Apocrypha, Deas Sea Scrolls, and Pseudepigrapha. These references suggest that porneia and its cognates should be understood as referring to all unlawful sexual intercourse or immoral sex but not more broadly to all forms of sexual immorality (e.g., lust). Or in other words, porneia is a smaller subset of sexual immorality.
A number of English translations were also examined. Hutchison noted that, “English translations from Tyndale to the 1901 ASV regularly translated porneia “fornication. In the 20th century, translations began to render the term more diversely, frequently using the broader concept of “sexual immorality.”
It was a helpful presentation and I hope that it will be published in some format in the near future.
Apr 5, 2016
Apr 4, 2016
Apr 3, 2016
The Septuagint
Paul Lawrence provides a brief history of the Septuagint here.
Labels:
LXX,
Old Testament,
Septuagint,
Translations
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)