This article was very interesting, good background and informative. Thanks for posting this. Quite frankly, the only distraction was the B.C.E. and C.E. notations. It is a good reminder that even today we are in conflict with those who want to suppress the truth. (I'm not referring to the author but the proponents of these notations.)...so much for venting.
2 comments:
This article was very interesting, good background and informative. Thanks for posting this. Quite frankly, the only distraction was the B.C.E. and C.E. notations. It is a good reminder that even today we are in conflict with those who want to suppress the truth. (I'm not referring to the author but the proponents of these notations.)...so much for venting.
Thanks for your comments Dale.
Concerning the B.C.E. and C.E. designations, you might be interested in these comments from a non-conservative blogger:
http://ntwrong.wordpress.com/2009/01/04/use-ad-and-bc-out-with-ce-and-bce/
Post a Comment